a head in the District of South

In 2005, a dispute over successive Attorney General appointments came to a head in the District of South Dakota after the executive branch and the district court disagreed on the appropriate appointee. On December 22, 2005, the first interim U.S. Attorney resigned before the end of her 120-day term, and the Attorney General appointed a second interim U.S. Attorney. The district’s chief judge argued the Attorney General did not have authority to make a second 120-day appointment. Accordingly, the court entered an order naming someone else as interim U.S. Attorney, citing Section 546(d). The executive branch disagreed with this view and on January 9, 2006, sent a letter หนังใหม่2025